ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY IN CHILDREN - STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES OF THE DEVELOPMENT

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This study focuses on the successful application of robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of congenital anomalies and acquired diseases in pediatric population. The purpose of this scientific review consists in highlighting the spectrum, indications, applicability, and effectiveness of robotic endosurgery in children. We demonstrated in this study a success of robotic-assisted surgery at patients with hydronephrosis, gastroesophageal reflux, pulmonary anomalies and other congenital diseases.

About the authors

Yu. A. Kozlov

Municipal Pediatric Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Continuing Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: yuriherz@hotmail.com
Russian Federation

Dzh. . Mihan

University of Washington; Seattle Children's Hospital

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

V. A. Novozhilov

Municipal Pediatric Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Continuing Education

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

P. Zh. Baradieva

Municipal Pediatric Hospital

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Li H., Gail M. H., Scott Braithwaite R., Gold H. T., Walter D., Liu M. et al. Are hospitals «keeping up with the Joneses»? Assessing the spatial and temporal diffusion of the surgical robot // Healthcare. 2014. Vol. 2. Р. 152-157.
  2. De Lambert G., Fourcade L., Centi J., Fredon F., Braik K., Szwarc C. et al. How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures // Surg. Endosc. 2013. Vol. 27. Р. 2137-2144.
  3. Meininger D. D., Byhahn C., Heller K., Gutt C. N., Westphal K. Totally endoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a robotic system in a child // Surg. Endosc. 2001. Vol. 15. Р. 1360.
  4. Cundy T. P., Shetty K., Clark J., Chang T. P., Sriskandarajah K., Gattas N. E. et al. The first decade of robotic surgery in children // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013. Vol. 48. Р. 858-865.
  5. Ballouhey Q., Villemagne T., Cros J., Vacquerie V., Bérenguer D., Braik K., Szwarc C., Longis B., Lardy H., Fourcade L. Assessment of paediatric thoracic robotic surgery // Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2015. Vol. 20. Р. 300-303.
  6. Slater B. J., Meehan J. J. Robotic repair of congenital diaphragmatic anomalies // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2009. Vol. 19, Suppl. S. 123-1277.
  7. Meehan J. J., Elliott S., Sandler A. The robotic approach to complex hepatobiliary anomalies in children: preliminary report // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2007. Vol. 42. Р. 2110-2114.
  8. Meehan J. J., Sandler A. D. Robotic resection of mediastinal masses in children // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech A. 2008. Vol. 18. Р. 114-119.
  9. Intuitive Surgical. Annual Report 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://phx.corporateir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MjIzOTk3fENoaWxkSU Q9LTF8VHlwZT0z&t=1.
  10. Kant A. J., Klein M. D., Langenburg S. E. Robotics in pediatric surgery: perspectives for imaging // Pediatr. Radiol. 2004. Vol. 34. Р. 454-461.
  11. Chandra V., Dutta S., Albanese C. T. Surgical robotics and image guided therapy in pediatric surgery: emerging and converging minimal access technologies // Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2006. Vol. 15. Р. 267-275.
  12. van Haasteren G., Levine S., Hayes W. Pediatric robotic surgery: early assessment // Pediatrics. 2009. Vol. 124. Р. 1642-1649.
  13. Meehan J. J. Robotic surgery for pediatric tumors // Cancer J. 2013. Vol. 19. Р. 183-188.
  14. Berlinger N. T. Robotic surgery - squeezing into tight places // New Engl. J. Med. 2006. Vol. 354. Р. 2099-2101.
  15. Mattei P. Minimally invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain in children // Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2007. Vol. 19. Р. 338-343.
  16. Lee R. S., Retik A. B., Borer J. G., Peters C. A. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dis- membered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery // J. Urol. 2006. Vol. 175. Р. 683-687.
  17. Yee D. S., Shanberg A. M., Duel B. P., Rodriguez E., Eichel L., Rajpoot D. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children // Urology. 2006. Vol. 67. Р. 599-602.
  18. Anderson J. E., Chang D. C., Parsons J. K., Talamini M. A. The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States // J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2012. Vol. 215. Р. 107-114.
  19. Bochner B. H., Sjoberg D. D., Laudone V. P., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bladder Cancer Surgical Trials Group. A randomized trial of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy // New Engl. J. Med. 2014. Vol. 371. Р. 389-390.
  20. Geller E. J., Matthews C. A. Impact of robotic operative efficiency on profitability // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. Vol. 209. e1-5.
  21. Tomaszewski J. J., Matchett J. C., Davies B. J., Jackman S. V., Hrebinko R. L., Nelson J. B. Comparative hospital cost - analysis of open and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy // Urology. 2012. Vol. 80. Р. 126-129.
  22. AHA. Trendwatch Chartbook 2005 [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 26]. Available from: http://www.aha.org/research/reports/tw/chartbook/2014/table4-1.pdf.
  23. Akron Children’s Hospital. Annual Report [Internet]. (2013) [cited 2014 Aug 26]. Available from: http://annualreport.akronchildrens.org.
  24. Adikibi B. T., Mackinlay G. A., Clark M. C., Duthie G. H., Munro F. D. The risks of minimal access surgery in children: an aid to consent // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2012. Vol. 47. Р. 601-605.
  25. Cooper M. A., Ibrahim A., Lyu H., Makary M. A. Underreporting of robotic surgery complications // J. Heal. Qual [Internet]. (2013). Available from: http: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23980819.
  26. Chandra V., Nehra D., Parent R., Woo R., Reyes R., Hernandez-Boussard T. et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices // Surgery. 2010. Vol. 147. Р. 830-839.
  27. Depaepe A., Dolk H., Lechat M. F. The epidemiology of tracheo-oesophageal fistula and oesophageal atresia in Europe. EUROCAT Working Group // Arch. Dis. Child. 1993. Vol. 68. Р. 743-748.
  28. Wilson C. B. Adoption of new surgical technology // BMJ. 2006. Vol. 332. Р. 112-114.
  29. Barkun J. S., Aronson J. K., Feldman L. S., Maddern G. J., Strasberg S. M., Balliol C. et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations // Lancet. 2009. Vol. 374. Р. 1089-1096.
  30. Jones V. S., Cohen R. C. Two decades of minimally invasive pediatric surgery - taking stock // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2008. Vol. 43. Р. 1653-1659.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2015 Kozlov Y.A., Mihan D..., Novozhilov V.A., Baradieva P.Z.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 81892 от 24.09.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies